Three Strikes Law

Prof. Taylor, Patrica

All round the world there has been an ongoing issue with crime. Many of the crimes committed are both violent and nonviolent actions towards innocent people or places. What can possibly be done by law makers and enforcers to stop this ongoing problem? To help minimize these offenses the states has develop a way to take a stand against it being done, the Three Strikes Law. It basically states that if you are a convicted felon, on your third offense, misdemeanor/felony, “you’re out”.
With the states passing the three strikes law, it allows repeating offenders to remain behind bars for the rest of their lives. But is it fair to all offenders that continuously commit a crime to remain behind bars or should the ones that commit petty crimes be punished because of this law? In my opinion, if a person consist of committing a crime he or she shall be held responsible after the second time. Committing a crime in the first beginning can be more than enough times. Depending on the type of the crime such as murder or molestation, the person should be behind bars and stay there for the rest of their lives after the first offense.
Think about it for a minute, if all the habitual offenders are force to remain behind bars, our crime rates should drop opposed to if they are still on the streets committing the crimes. I think the three strikes law is a good effect on crime because it will make offenders think twice about committing a crime. Besides, let’s be realistic, a person knows if they will constantly commit the same crime or another one for that matter.