This essay Literature review with annotated bibliography has a total of 1307 words and 10 pages.
Literature review with annotated bibliography
Student No#: 141639
Unit Name: Tertiary Music Studies
Title: Literature review with annotated bibliography
Due Date: Week 6,
5pm Friday, 17th October 2014
Many people have accredited Brian Epstein for The Beatles worldwide success, yet it seems
that he has been overlooked as an inductee into the ‘Rock n Roll Hall of Fame Non-
Performer Area’ for over 29 years. This review will focus on 3 major things Epstein did to
help the Beatles success which emerge repeatedly throughout the literature reviewed.
These are: His absolute belief in the band, his vision for the bands’ image, and the Beatles
musicality. This paper will primarily focus on whether Epstein contribution to The Beatles
success merits a place in the ‘Rock n Roll Hall of Fame Non-Performer Area’.
According to Spitz (2005) and Riley (2011) there are two different theories about how
Epstein was introduced to the music of the Beatles. Epstein himself states that he was first
introduced to the Beatles from a customer Raymond Jones when he requested a copy of ‘My
Bonnie’ from the NEMS record store that Epstein managed as part of the family business. “I
had never [before] given a thought to any of the Liverpool beat groups then up and coming
[sic] in the cellar clubs” (Spitz, 2005, p.266).
While Riley (2011) argues that Epstein knew about the Beatles long before he let on. As a
prominent record store manager, Epstein regularly advertised in Mersey Beats and was also
a columnist in the music driven newspaper. Riley (2011) suggests that “Epstein wanted his
Beatlemaniac readers to believe that he didn’t read anything in Mersey Beats except his own
ads” (Riley, 2011, p.141).
Regardless of the way Epstein discovered the Beatles, the one thing no one can deny is his
immediate attraction to the band and the belief that they would be one of the best. “I was
immediately struck by their music, their beat, and their sense of humour on stage. And even
afterwards when I met them again I was struck again by their personal charm. And it was
there that really it all started” (Lewis, n.d, para 7).
Almost a month after the Beatles had signed a management deal with Epstein, he was
becoming rather disappointed in there stage presence, appearance, and there abilty to
sequence set of songs during a live show. Spitz states
He insisted on some ground rules. From now on, eating onstage was out; so was
smoking and punching one another, cursing, chatting up girls, taking requests, and
sleeping. Lateness would no longer be tolerated – In addition to the above, the
Beatles were required to post their set lists beforehand and – this provoked heated
debate – bow after each number. And not just a casual nod – a big, choreographed
bow, which, by a silent count, was delivered smartly and on cue – Later on, he would
convince the others of the wisdoms in wearing suits (Spitz, 2005, p.280)
Lewis concurs that “He got the Beatles out of their mid-1950s leather and jeans look and
into very stylish early – 1960s mod suits. Without that they would have never got on TV
shows in that era (Lewis, n.d, para 11). There was no denying that there new image played a
major role in their rise to the top of the industry. Without this vast change, the Beatles
career could have been immensely different. The point that many historians miss is that
Epstein’s makeover was just from a visual perspective. The Beatles’ sound was their own.
The decision to not interfere with the Beatles music is considered one of the best decisions
that Epstein made. According to Liverpool Historian Spencer Leigh, “Epstein biggest triumph
was in leaving the Beatle’s music alone” (Riley, 2011, p.153) However, Epstein did influence
the Beatles when it came to single releases. During the release of A Hard Day’s Night Epstein
pushed to have “Can’t Buy Me Love” released as single instead of “Roll Over Beethoven”.
This song went on to reach No.1 in the US. Dolloff states “The very idea of a group writing all
of the music and lyrics themselves was unheard of in the early 1960s, but Epstein insisted on
it” (Dolloff, 2013, para
Topics Related to Literature review with annotated bibliography
Counterculture of the 1960s, Brian Epstein, Apple Corps, The Beatles, Epstein, Fifth Beatle
Essays Related to Literature review with annotated bibliography
What is lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)? Effects What is lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)? Effects and hazards of LSD Written by Kathleen Davis FNP Knowledge center Published: Monday 29 June 2015 Published: Mon 29 Jun 2015 email 5 2 Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is an illegal drug whose primary effect is to alter the senses and cause hallucinations. Formulated in 1938 as a treatment for respiratory depression , Swiss chemist Albert Hofmann inadvertently discovered LSD's unique properties when he accidentally absorbed some on his skin. Beli